Read my post about March for Federalization of Siberia at Legal Insurrection blog. Considering the time differences, the march is probably not happening as I type.
August 16, 2014
August 15, 2014
Given how they are too post-modern for the conflict between good and evil,the New York Times doesn’t do well with moral clarity. Israel fighting HAMAS is too much for them. But here comes Ukraine’s Donbas region, with war full of no good guys, and voila– they get it!
LUHANSK, Ukraine — Every night, as darkness falls over Luhansk, the focus now of intense humanitarian concern and geopolitical intrigue, a cat-and-mouse artillery duel begins.
In a neighborhood of high-rise apartments, residents can readily identify the hollow pops of mortars as they echo among the buildings. After that, rebel fighters can be seen hastily dismantling the weapons and hauling them away.
An hour or so later, the Ukrainian military’s response comes: the whistle and boom of incoming artillery shells, fired from guns outside the city, in a fruitless attempt at silencing the rebel gunners.
You mean, it’s not Russian terrorists executing multiple large-scale false flag operations bombing Ukrainian cities? While Putin’s fingerprints are all over the whole separatist business and some of his special forces are fighting in Ukraine, let me assure you, as a person who reads both Russian and Ukrainian, and knows people in Eastern Ukraine, few in Ukraine* believe the fairytale that Russian terrorists are slaughtering loyal Ukrainians. And that it’s not a widespread opinion presents a problem for Kiev — the kind of problem that requires a radical solution. Many Donbas residents are so convinced that it’s Ukrainian armed forces shell their towns, that they flee to Russia en mass, while others move westward into Ukraine where they don’t register as refugees for the fear of being drafted into Ukrainian army, but busy themselves with defacing Ukrainian flags.
NYT collected the following sample of popular opinion in Luhansk:
Polina Ivanova, a resident of one ravaged area, was sympathetic to the rebel mortar crew. “Look how many civilians are dying,” she said. “They are trying to protect us, and they have nowhere else to fire from. We are surrounded.”
She stood on a stoop in the predawn with Ekaterina Vladimirova, a neighbor who had a different opinion. “Both sides don’t care about us,” Ms. Vladimirova said. “For them, it’s a game. One shoots that way, the other shoots this way, and simple people suffer.”
Oleg Romanov, 29, said he huddled in terror with his wife and 1-year-old son in an apartment while “it booms all night long, and plaster falls from the ceiling.” He then rises at 4 a.m. to take his place in a line for water, and make the rounds of stores to hunt for groceries.
“The rebels fire Grads and leave, and then, of course, the answer comes back to that spot,” he said. “The rebels are long gone by then, but people are still around.”
That’s a pretty representative spread.
The only thing NYT missed in their story is that the utilities in Luhansk, Slavyansk and other Eastern Ukrainian cities were turned off by Kiev. All in all, the paper of record should stop covering Israel and refocus on Ukraine, which they are infinitely more adept to cover.
It’s not just Ukrainians who question the official account. Human Rights Watch checked out what’s going on in Donbas, and came up with a report confirming the use of Grad rockets by Ukrainian Army. Yes, I know it’s HRW.
June 19, 2014
Echo Moskvy, one of the few opposition media sources (this is not an all-out endorsement, there are some despicable opposition figures in Russia) retells a personal story, corroborated with pictures, that previously made the rounds in Russian social media. The event took place in late May:
Sick and sunburned, my daughter Ksenia returned from a Saturday celebration staged for Putin on St. Petersburg’s Isaakievsky Square. 5000 people, most of them from children’s’ choirs were appropriated to sing songs for the leader! It was titled “The Limitless Wonder of the World”.
It was 30 degrees Celsius [~90 F – ed.] in Peter [St. Petersburg -- ed.] that day. All 40 under the sun! The children were sent off at 8 am.
Prior to the entrance to the square, the children’s choir was thoroughly searched. Documents were required (my child is 12, so I provided her birth certificate), then bottled water and juices brought by children were confiscated.
And then as usual – everyone waited several hours for the tzar, who’s always behind the schedule. A five-thousand-strong crowd was blazing under the sun until noon. The only entertainment was watching the snipers that swarmed all the roofs around Isakievsky Square. Six out of the 37 children in our choir fell ill, and, our daughter observed, people were fainting right and left — volunteers and doctors were barely able to take them away and treat them with water.
Putin appeared for about 3 minutes in the middle of the concert, took pictures against the background of several thousand children (the leader and children — always a good picture!), then gave a short speech and departed. The concert went on until 2 pm.
Ksenia did not last until the end of performance. She regained consciousness in medical tent where they threw water on her.
With all the traffic jams, the children returned to Sestroretsk by 4:30.
The child was hungry — she was not allowed to take any food — sunburnt, and in wet clothes, so she refused to go to the Birthday party of our friends’ child.
She also missed school on Monday because she wasn’t feeling well.
She is still not 100% after this show-off (Russian показухa — ed.) for the leader, which should really be called “The limitless shame of Peter”…
Words fail me.
Words fail me too, but for a different reason. It’s not merely that the children got sunburnt — kids get sunburns — or even that so many of them fainted. It’s that the parents allowed the state to use their kids for propaganda purposes, when they should have expected the state to use them up and spit them out.
When in 2008 a group of Beverly Hills parents encouraged their children to sing a silly ode to then presidential candidate Obama, at least half the country was vocally disgusted by the creepy production. But note, that was parents raising their own kids. And while some of these parents surely think, in abstraction, that children belong to the “community”, they do not realize that the logical outcome of this line of thought is wholesale child abuse.
The fatalistic submission of St. Petersburg parents is not at all surprising. When I was growing up in the former Soviet Union, subjects, young and old, were herded to all sorts of mass events. We went because we went. Adults had their own parallel holiday — gave to Caesar what was Caesar’s and had a semi-discreet swig of vodka. Children came, and our little selves were twisted into submission early on.
Not much has changed since the collapse of the Soviet Union. It did not occur to the parent, who obviously dislikes Putin, to excuse her child from the event, however easy that would had been to do. Nobody called in sick. Everyone knows their place.
March 28, 2014
Or third, if we count the Orange Revolution of 2004. The Orange Revolution peacefully reversed election theft by Russia-supported Viktor Yanukovich. For a moment, Ukraine united behind democratically elected nationalist Viktor Yushchenko supported by the West. Yushchenko eventually deflated, receiving a mere 5.5% of the vote in 2010 presidential election. He was replaced by his former arch-nemesis Yanukovich (they’d since kissed and made up), now democratically elected.
In November 2014, demonstrators demanded the resignation of Yanukovich, who by now signed an agreement to enter Russia’s Customs Union, leaving the EU association. Demonstrations, that had support of about 1/2 of the country quickly turned violent. The violence was perpetrated by neo-Nazi groups Svoboda and Pravy Sektor. One of the three chief leaders of Euromaidan, as the protest became known, was Oleg Tyagnybok (I’m going to spell his name with g‘s because I can and with an y because it sounds funny to a Russian speaker — inside knowledge, I know) of Svoboda. Those protests were marked by chants of “Moskolej na nozhi” or “Stub moskals (derogatory for Russian) with knives” and wild hopping teens screaming “Kto ne skache, tot moskal” or “The one who doesn’t hop is a moskal”. Certainly, there was more to it. Most Ukrainians, whatever their political leanings, were clearly fed up with poverty and corruption. Many wanted to be a European country. Most understood that neither the EU not NATO are in a position to include them.
Protesters waved the black and red flags of the Nazi-collaborating Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists/Ukrainian Insurgent Army alongside Ukrainian flags. Nazis attacked riot police. In other words, if Occupy or the Tea Party were doing it, they wouldn’t last a day. Because we are not a failed state. Yet.
The protesters achieved their goal of overthrowing Yanukovich and installing their own “people’s trust” government. Ukraine’s south-east, which voted for Yanukovich, is not exactly pleased with this turn of events. Wasting no time, Putin chopped off majority ethnic Russia Crimea. His previously waning popularity soared among the Russians; the nation was Crimea-crazy since the break up of the Soviet Union. Now, the US, along with Britain and France found themselves in a curious bind. Being the signatories to Budapest Memorandum, we promised to guarantee Ukraine’s territorial integrity in exchange for nuclear disarmament. Needless to say, we have no appetite for going to war. But why did we recognize the current government in the first place? So far they’ve achieved two goals: Replacing one set of oligarchs with another and moving up the regularly scheduled election by a whopping 9 months.
Now, I’m happy Ukraine is disarmed because their current equivalent of secretary of defense is a Nazi, as are many other members of the provisional cabinet. There are moderates in the cabinet, of course. Among the Kerensky figures is the “people’s trust” PM Arseni Yatsenyuk who looks like a mix of a grass-hopper and a rabbit. He proclaimed himself a “kamikaze” ready to make unpopular economic decisions. That he did. In the meantime, Putin annexed Crimea waiving the carrot of higher pensions and capital investment before the residents of the peninsula.
The provisional Ukrainian government turned off Russian television and is readying prosecution of separatists from the south-east. To behead pro-Russian opposition, “lustration” of political adversaries, Yanukovich’s Party of Regions is in the works. Pravy Sektor, displeased with the slow speed of “lustration” and general lack of revolutionary progress, vowed a new, more radical revolution to accomplish the goals of Maidan.
In the meantime, former Chechen fighter and Pravy Sektor YouTube super-star “Sashko Bilyi” filmed on multiple occasions threatening and assaulting officials in the Western Ukrainian city of Rovno (Rivne), was shot and killed by local law enforcement, allegedly resisting arrest. Rovno is the territory of Batkivshchina, the moderate nationalist party of Yatsenyuk and formerly jailed former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko.
On the other hand, in the opening salvo of her Presidential campaign Tymoshenko released that audio of herself promising to “kill Russian-speaking Ukrainians with nuclear weapons”. This didn’t deter Pravy Sektor, who, in the aftermath of Bilyi’s death immediately pledged to avenge him, from surrendering the Ukrainian Parliament, the Vekhovna Rada. The radicals who strong-armed the revolution and now found themselves in positions of power don’t poll well, so it’s in their interest to start a civil war.
To add to this mess, Russian tanks are positioned on the Ukrainian border, and Russian TV aired national weather forecast that included Ukraine’s north-eastern regions of Donetsk, Kharkiv and Luhansk. Protests across the south-east are ongoing, sometimes calling for federalization of the country, sometimes — for restoration of Yanukovich and/or the Soviet Union and /or the Russian Empire withing the 1917 borders. Since Sacramento, CA, which boasts a sizable Russian and Ukrainian population, was not a part of the 1917 borders, the US might be off the hook. But neither Poland nor Finland are.
Many observers anticipated that after the victory Kyiv nationalists will relocate their protest onto the enemy soil of south-east Ukraine, but that didn’t really happen. Some Pravy Sektor revolutionaries did attempt to occupy government buildings in these areas, but they were kicked out. A few shoot-outs notwithstanding, Maidan presence on the Party of Regions strongholds was limited. Revolutionaries stayed home, parading through the streets of western Ukraine, and, being the only armed group there, harassing locals.
In a highly televised (in Russia) video, the citizens of the eastern Ukrainian industrial region of Donbas attempted to stop a Ukrainian tank. (X-rated Russian language, real action starts at about 5:05):
Interesting times lie ahead for Ukraine.
March 17, 2014
Russia is back, mostly due to incompetence of the US foreign policy.
You might had heard of a state Russian TV host opining that Russia is the only country in the world capable of turning the US into radioactive dust. This might be grandstanding, but, on a more low-key note, Russia wants to litigate Alaska back:
I couldn’t find an English translation, but trust me, English-speaking readers, this is what this very serious TV segment is all about. Actually, half of the Russian-speaking people around the world is not quite sure how the large-breasted kept her face straight through this segment.
One thing for sure, though, we need a new president.
February 14, 2014
Friends and readers, here is my post about the Sochi opening ceremony at Legal Insurrection.
September 24, 2013
Having recently caught the largest pike in the world, Russia’s “President” Vladimir Putin felt emboldened to write an New York Times op-ed. Either that or he ate Barack Obama for breakfast.
In that op-ed of his, Vlad the Shirtless insisted that American exceptionalism as “dangerous”. I’m sure the main reason Putin focused on American exceptionalism is because he was addressing America’s own wishy-washy elites. Still, lets not forget taht Russia has it’s own wanna-be exceptionalism issues. Check out this from The Primary Chronicles, the manuscript, compiled in 1113 in Kiev, widely recognized as the first attempt at Russian history:
Invitation to the Rus’
860-862 (6368-6370) [The four tribes who had been forced to pay tribute to the Varangians--Chuds, Slavs, Merians, and Krivichians] drove the Varangians back beyond the sea, refused to pay them further tribute, and set out to govern themselves. But there was no law among them, and tribe rose against tribe. Discord thus ensued among them, and they began to war one against the other. They said to themselves, “Let us seek a prince who may rule over us, and judge us according to custom [po nravu]“. Thus they went overseas to the Varangians, to the Rus. These particular Varangians were known as Rus’, just as some are called Swedes, and others Normans and Angles, and still others Gotlanders, for they were thus named. The Chuds, the Slavs, the Krivichians and the Ves then said to the Rus, “Our land is great and rich, but there is no order in it. Come reign as princes, rule over us”. Three brothers, with their kinfolk, were selected. They brought with them all the Rus’ and migrated. The oldest, Rurik, located himself in Novgorod; the second, Sineus, in Beloozero; and the third, Truvor, in Izborsk. From these Varangians, the Russian land received its name [prozvalas’ Russkaia zemlia]. Thus those who live in Novgorod are descended from the Varangian tribe, but earlier they were Slavs. Within two years, Sineus and his brother Truvor died. Rurik gathered sole authority into his own hands, parceling out cities to his own men, Polotsk to one, Rostov to another, and to another Beloozero. The Varangians in these cities are colonists, but the first settlers in Novgorod were Slavs; in Polotsk, Krivichians; in Beloozero, Ves; in Rostov, Merians; and in Murom, Muromians. Rurik had dominion over all these folk. Two of Rurik’s men [Askold and Dir] who were not of his tribe but were warriors [boyare] sought permission to go to Tsar’grad [Constantinople] with their tribe. They thus sailed down the Dnepr, and in the course of their journey they saw a small city on a hill. They asked, “Whose town is this? ” The inhabitants answered, “There were three brothers, Kii, Shchek and Khoriv, who built this burg, but they have since died. We who are their descendants dwell here and pay tribute to the Khazars [ID]“. Askold and Dir remained in this city, and after gathering together many Varangians, they established their dominion over the country of the Polianians. Rurik ruled in Novgorod. [Bold is mine, --ed.]
“Don’t thread on me” this isn’t.
I don’t think there is anything exceptional about this kind of history, and, to be fair, a republican government existed in Novgorod in the middle ages. Novgorod was eventually swallowed by Moscow, whose then Prince Ivan the Terrible went on to call himself a tzar, the name derived from Latin Cesar. After the fall of Constantinople into the hands of the Ottomans, Russians took to thinking of themselves as the third Rome. C. 1520 Russian monk Philotheus wrote: “Two Romes have fallen, but the third stands, and a fourth there will not be.” Not exactly a match for American exceptionalism, but, clearly, Russian rulers thought of themselves as very special people.
Having conquered the Republic of Novgorod in 1478, Moscovy went on to expend its empire which become the world’s largest a few centuries later, occupying half of Europe and stretching all the way to the Pacific. Russiana wasn’t exactly bringing civilization to Lithuanians or freedom to the cossacks of Zaporozhian Sich. The 19th century Russian populist socialist Alexander Herzen called his native land “prison of the peoples”.
The Bolsheviks toppled Romanovs and undermined Orthodox Christianity, but the dream of empire remained. Moscow became the sight of the Third International, a communist organization dedicated to fight:
by all available means, including armed force, for the overthrow of the international bourgeoisie and for the creation of an international Soviet republic as a transition stage to the complete abolition of the State.
The 1943 Soviet national anthem proclaimed that “Great Russia had assembled the unshakable union of the free republics” (a reference to the 15 “republics” of the Soviet Union), while the Soviet coat of arms superimposed hammer and cycle over the globe. In a 1941 musical comedy “The Swineheard and the Shepard”, a young woman from Ukraine meets a young man from Georgia at an agricultural expo in Moscow. They fall in love and coyly serenade each other: “I will never forget a friend if I met him in Moscow”.
In 1939 Stalin and Hitler divided Central Europe, and after the end of World War II, Stalin created a “buffer zone” well into Germany. In 1979 The Politburo marched its troupes into Afghanistan, and a few years later Ronald Reagan referred to Russia as an “evil empire”. I remember my 90’s travel guide warning against attempting to communicate with Czechs in German. Well, just try Russian.
Anyhow, I can see how annoying it is, from Russia’s perspective, to watch the US, a reluctant Third Rome. I can see how frustrating, too, to observe Barack Obama, a bumbling fool fed on the ideology crafted somewhere in Lubyanka, and to think “We lost the Cold War — to THEM?” Putin wants to restore Russia to its former glory, which is quite a task. The US might be in decline, but so is Russia, and so is every other geo-political entity on this planet. In any event, we are in his way.