sitting on the edge of the sandbox, biting my tongue

April 1, 2011

Dithering Motherhood

Filed under: relationships, society — Tags: , , , — edge of the sandbox @ 12:20 am

I’m one of those women who always knew that I wanted to have kids, which, I suppose, is fairly common of somebody born in the Soviet Union in the 1970s. Through my twenties I met American women my age who said that they either didn’t want kids or plan to have them in their early forties.  That didn’t seem like much of a plan, so I assumed that they don’t want to give their game away.

Then there is the unnerving phenomena of dithering would-be-mothers.  Am I ready?  Am I not ready?  And I’m probably not ready yet, but I’ll know when I’m ready.  Elle columnist Corrie Pikul doesn’t know if she’s ready.  At 35, she’s not sure if she wants to:

Until recently, babies weren’t my priority: I had to find a career, a partner, myself. I’d deal with the motherhood question later. Now I’m 35 and married. “Later” has arrived — and I’m still solidly, intractably ambivalent. My husband, also undecided, looks to me for guidance and motivation. I figured the issue would somehow resolve itself: Like Alyson Hannigan’s character on How I Met Your Mother, I’d grab my husband one day and half sexily, half scarily demand that he “put a baby in me!” Or, after many heartfelt, wine-soaked conversations, we’d decide we were too selfish/broke/inept to have children of our own, and toast to a future of aunt- and unclehood. Instead, now that I’ve entered the five-year period when fertility experts strongly urge women to get busy, the indecision is agonizing.

Ms. Pikul is agonizing over wrong things.  I can assure her that she’s not going to be a perfect mother, but imperfection doesn’t stop us breeders.  If she and her husband put their mind to it, they can swing it financially, I can assure her of that too.  If she’s afraid that parenting will change her life forever, again, no need to worry because it will.  She can’t figure out what motherhood will be like from observing other mothers, because her body and her mind will change through pregnancies and post-partum.  It’s biology.  It’s also an experience she has to live through to understand.

Trying to figure out how many more years of fertility she might or might not have is an exercise in futility because she can’t know for sure until it’s too late.  Likewise trying to figure out whether or not it’s her biological clock that she hears ticking is a waste of precious time.  She might sort out her emotions — eventually.  When it’s adoption time.  Perhaps the fact of her dithering in and of itself should tell her something. Then again, Ms. Pikul’s occupation requires her to dwell on things, and so she dwells on her indecisiveness for our entertainment.

What Pikul needs to consider is where she wants to be five years from now when she’s forty.  Or fifteen years from now when she’s celebrating her 50th Birthday.  What about her old age? She might want to interview childless post-menopausal women and see what they have to say.  One of my former co-workers once opened up and said that she regrets her childlessness.  I hear it’s a pretty common sentiment.

Not that childlessness is always wrong.  If you are Condolizza Rice, it’s probably worth it, but most childless women will not end up Secretaries of State.  In any event, absence of a progeny is not a prerequisite for the job.  If a dithering 35-year-old still wants to party — well, that’s an entirely different matter, but as many mothers, I’m sure, will testify, care-free life is much less satisfying than a normal human life cycle.  Considering that youth will slip away regardless, is our indecisive would-be mother looking forward to middle age?

My mother-in-law had six kids.  Each Christmas her house fills with laughter of her many grandchildren.  I envy her because I know that unless my children will turn Orthodox (unlikely), I’m not going to have old age like hers.  As a matter of fact, the way people breed now I’d be lucky to have any grandchildren at all.

Le Nain Brothers, A Vist to Grandmother, 1640s.

I don’t like the culture of not breeding, and I find graying societies are joyless.  I also don’t understand why any woman needs to take 35 years to find herself, as Ms. Pikul claims to have done.  If she thinks that she had to figure out who she is, well, maybe she did, and maybe she didn’t, but once she has a baby, all her self-discovery might just go out of the window.  Also, what’s the value of her self-discovery, if it doesn’t deal with most important question in life: Do I want to have children?  I find it peculiar that the question didn’t come up when Pikul was getting married.  And what is self-discovery if not a search for purpose in life, a void traditionally filled by children.  All that money she gave to her shrink and costly hobbies could have gone to a college fund.

S.E. Cupp hit some of the similar notes in her latest column:

I recently had the pleasure of sitting on a Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute panel with two remarkable women, Phyllis Schlafly and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), as we discussed the role that women have played in conservative activism. Listening to them wax poetic about marriage and motherhood, I felt pangs of guilt and disappointment that I hadn’t yet experienced either. And not because I hadn’t found the right guy, couldn’t afford kids or couldn’t conceive, but because I didn’t really want to.

Despite the efforts of a few courageous women like Schlafly and Bachmann to celebrate the family, one of the consequences of second- and third-wave feminism has been that motherhood has become an afterthought, the thing you do you after you’ve done everything else, if at all.

My mother was no feminist. She just wanted to raise a happy kid who had the opportunities she didn’t. But thanks to the persistent march of liberalism, feminism and secularism, the society that once raised girls to become women who get married and have a family is now the same society that raises girls to remain perennially youthful, become pop singers or reality stars and have children out of wedlock so their baby bumps make the cover of People magazine.

Cupp is not very generous to her generation.  I’m saddened that  feminism inspires the  shallow live-in-the-moment lifestyles of many contemporary American women.

Although recent medical advances enable us to extend fertility, at least to some degree, parenting is easier on the young.  A forty year-old might not have the energy for 2 am feedings and toddler-chasing excursions.  Younger mothers are probably less likely to overthink their duties and overprotect their progeny.  Younger mothers are going to be younger, more energetic grandmothers — a huge benefit for the entire clan.

In any event, I hope my children’s generation will do better breeding-wise.  I hope they will learn from the mistakes of women my age.  I don’t want my daughter agonizing over her fertility, and I don’t want my son to marry a woman with whom he’ll be unable to have children.  I am going to teach them that family is very important. That there is no greater joy in life then to hold a beautiful toddler (from one to two is my favorite age, turns out) and to teach your children what you know.  I think it’s a mistake on parents’ part to assume that either parenthood will come naturally or it’s optional, and therefore it’s unnecessary to bring up future parents.



  1. What an excellent read. Being a man, I can not empathize with much of the emotional stuff about motherhood you speak to, but as a father of three, I can definitely talk about the joy of children.

    I couldn’t imagine being married without having kids, it seems pointless. Taking my kids to a baseball game, watching their plays in school, or their soccer games, these are all joys that are missing to the child-less married couple. This might explain the high-levels of divorce in America – people get into marriage thinking only of themselves, and if they do have a kid, it probably isn’t planned at all, so it is a “burden” as opposed to the pleasure it should be.

    Comment by fleeceme — April 1, 2011 @ 10:14 am

    • Our society, younger people, at least, do seem too selfish to have kids and/or stay married. I agree about marriage without children. Why even bother. But to each its own, I guess.

      Comment by edgeofthesandbox — April 1, 2011 @ 8:22 pm

  2. Great post, Missy. I was one of those ditherers, once, so I have a peek into the mindset.

    It’s all about wanting to have it all, but being smart enough to realize you can’t, really, and the appearance of kids will prove it.

    I was a step ahead of ladies like SE Cupp though, because I was married at 28.

    Marriage is a contract, so we discussed these things before the wedding. He wanted a big family. I didn’t want kids. We compromised with an agreement to try for one. I had a “one kid veto power.” Part of me actually hoped nature just wouldn’t provide.

    Ha. It did. And it turns out, I didn’t want to exercise my veto after all. Now he’s the one saying, mmm, not three, okay?

    LOL how things change.

    Comment by nooneofanyimport — April 1, 2011 @ 2:12 pm

    • Ha! I always wanted kids but only married at 32. I supposed, I was busy dropping out of grad school. I did take me quite some time to find a good man. By the time I met DH I was 28 and about to give up on the idea of an arty guy who is also husband material.
      My brother-in-law convinced DH that after two kids can put his foot down. On my part… although it would be nice to have another, I’m not comfortable with the risks of advanced maternal age.

      Comment by edgeofthesandbox — April 1, 2011 @ 8:30 pm

  3. Fabulous post, and LOL re NOOAI’s comment. I married a few weeks before my 28th birthday, and DH and I spent most of the first two years of our marriage on separate continents. Ah, the joy of deployments. I had our first at 32. And wish I could have three more. Here’s praying for one (or two? A girl can hope). I find it funny that I always wanted one or two and now I wish we could have started earlier. Be careful what you wish for…

    Comment by pjMom — April 2, 2011 @ 2:23 pm

  4. […] sitting on the edge of the sandbox, biting my tongue – in spite of the uber-long name that is a pain in the butt to type (no wonder NoOneofAnyImport likes her) she is an excellent writer with an excellent view of the world, her latest post is about Motherhood and how many women in this age dither on the subject […]

    Pingback by Fleece’s Faves – “Mercy” edition « Fleece Me — April 4, 2011 @ 3:41 pm

  5. Thoughtful post here.

    One other point: As Mark Steyn says, “The future goes to those who show up for it”. Many of us have decided not to send some kids to tommorrow’s party, so o speak. That can’t be good.

    Comment by KingShamus — April 6, 2011 @ 12:41 am

    • Yes, it can’t be good for the society. In my neighborhood we are well under 2 children/woman. It’s sad, and it’s not something that happens in a confident culture.

      Comment by edgeofthesandbox — April 6, 2011 @ 3:20 am

  6. […] Dithering Motherhood […]

    Pingback by A Year of Blogging « sitting on the edge of the sandbox, biting my tongue — September 27, 2011 @ 4:17 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: